The drama that unfurled on the internets this week could rival a TVB grand production. If you don't know what's up, or you really aren't a drama person anyway, just read this concise timeline from SAYS (who frankly seem to be a little too enthusiastic). With so many people weighing in on the matter, it's quite difficult to keep track of what's going on.

I've been following this whole drama since day 1. While I can't say I know the perpetrator well enough to judge him or give him a death sentence, I have seen him in "action" at several events, including my cousin's wedding dinner, which still creeps me out to this day. And kids, no matter how nice the big, fedora-wearing man with a camera is, never, ever let him rub his slimy hands all over you.

I digress.

When he came out with his statement, after being caught with his hands down his pants (literally I suppose), what intrigued me the most was that he claimed it was all an elaborate "social experiment". Now, this is an interesting point, because I've handled a few social experiments in my time as a university student, and all of them involved something called "subject permission". So this new format of "social experimenting" with subjects who didn't even know they were playing a part was honestly both baffling, and frankly, exciting.